Fuzzy voters, Crisp Votes
نویسنده
چکیده
In a binary choice voting scenario, voters may have fuzzy preferences but are required to make crisp choices. In order to compare a crisp voting procedure with more general mechanisms of fuzzy preference aggregation, we first focus on the latter. We present a formulation of strategy-proofness in this setting and study its consequences. On one hand, we achieve an axiomatic recommendation of the median as the aggregation rule for fuzzy preferences. On the other hand, we present conditions under which strategic concerns imply the optimality of a crisp voting procedure and argue that there is a potential gain in the integration of the preference and choice aggregation programs namely that an underlying fuzzy preference structure may also help inform the selection of a choice aggregation
منابع مشابه
Linguistic majorities with difference in support
Majorities based on difference of votes and their extension, majorities based on difference in support, were introduced in social choice voting as tools to implement the crisp preference values (votes) and the intensities of preference provided by voters when comparing pairs of alternatives, respectively, with the aim to declare which alternative is socially preferred. Moreover, these rules req...
متن کاملBoosting of Fuzzy Rules with Low Quality Data
An extension of the Adaboost algorithm is proposed for obtaining fuzzy rule based classifiers from imprecisely perceived data. Isolated fuzzy rules are regarded as weak learners, and knowledge bases as ensembles. Rules are iteratively added to a base, and the search of the best rule at each iteration is carried out by a genetic algorithm driven by a fuzzy fitness function. The successive weight...
متن کاملAn Incoercible E-Voting Scheme Based on Revised Simplified Verifiable Re-encryption Mix-nets
Simplified verifiable re-encryption mix-net (SVRM) is revised and a scheme for e-voting systems is developed based on it. The developed scheme enables evoting systems to satisfy all essential requirements of elections. Namely, they satisfy requirements about privacy, verifiability, fairness and robustness. It also successfully protects voters from coercers except cases where the coercers force ...
متن کاملLet’s Be Fair: Do Polling Locations Prime Votes?
The 21st century is witnessing a change in how Americans cast their votes with fewer and fewer voters going to a designated location to vote. Throughout the 20th century, voters cast votes by going to an assigned location on voting day. But today, in three states-Colorado, Oregon and Washington-all ballots are cast by mail. Although the main reason for the changes is to increase voter turnout a...
متن کاملSplitting, Squeezing and Diluting: Policy Moderation when Candidacy is Endogenous and Voting is Sincere
This paper investigates the claim that giving voters multiple votes to cast would result in more moderate policies as compared to when voters have only one vote to cast. This claim is based on the argument that when voters have only one vote to cast, centrist candidates are squeezed between the left and right candidates who capture all the leftist and rightist votes. It has then been argued tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- IGTR
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007